UseMorpheus
  • MORPHEUS
  • The Market Demand
  • The Differentiator
  • The Architectures
  • Technical Consideration
  • Natural Language Contracts
  • Product Roadmap
  • Key Use Cases
  • Tokenomics & Income Stream
  • Demo
  • Pitch Deck
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Base Model Selection
  • Vertical Approach
  • Data Strategy
  • High-Quality Data Sources
  • Priority Smart Contract Types for Training
Export as PDF

Technical Consideration

Base Model Selection

The following coding-focused models will be tested to find the best performed one:

  • CodeLlama-70B (Meta)

  • DeepSeek-Coder

  • Mistral Codestral

  • Qwen 2.5 Coder

  • Claude 3.7

Vertical Approach

Targeted Fine-Tuning

  • Use Solidity/EVM-specific datasets (high-quality GitHub contracts + security audit reports)

  • Incorporate vulnerability pattern datasets

  • Include other programming language datasets (Rust, Move, etc.)

Knowledge Enhancement

  • Integrate OpenZeppelin standard libraries and EIP documentation as RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) knowledge sources

Data Strategy

High-Quality Data Sources

Positive Samples

  • Audited, well-known protocol code (e.g., Uniswap V4, Compound)

  • Standard implementations from OpenZeppelin Contracts

  • Reference implementations from EIP proposals (ERC-20/721/4337)

Negative Samples

  • Smart contract vulnerability case libraries (e.g., DASP Top 10)

  • Reconstructed code from DeFi attacks (The DAO, Parity Multisig, etc.)

  • Edge cases generated by fuzz testing

Priority Smart Contract Types for Training

  • Token Contracts

  • Payment Contracts

  • Governance Contracts

  • Identity Contracts

  • Staking Contracts

  • Lending Contracts

  • Exchange Contracts

  • Bridge Contracts

  • Multisig Contracts

  • Prediction Market Contracts

PreviousThe ArchitecturesNextNatural Language Contracts

Last updated 22 days ago